Howdy,
I was at home (of course)
over Christmas and boxing day... Looking at the
charts superficuially this
evening, I am a bit surprised at the current
wide-spread fire situation.
It looks like the fires flared up in
southerlies or southwesterlies..
Is this true? How high were the NSW
temperatures? What
were the synoptics leading to high fire potential?
cheers
JMcB
Reply from Robin Hicks
It seems that the fires started in the hotter conditions ahead of the trough that moved up the coast. Temperatures were hot ahead of the trough, which resulted in 39C temps in Brisbane on Christmas day, and ambulance reports of Queenslanders falling off their twig in the heat.
I've attached the hourly AWS obs from Camden (the nearest to the Warragamba fires of Christmas day). On both 24th and 25th, temperatures climbed into the mid 30's as westerly winds picked up. Pressures started rising and the wind went around WSW on the Tuesday evening. Wednesday was cooler but with still quite fresh winds, that moderated yesterday.
Cheers
Robin Hicks
a/SRFA
Services Policy Branch
Bureau of Meteorology, GPO
Box 1289K Melbourne, 3001
Tel 03 9669 4401
Fax 03 9669 4695
Reply from Elly Spark
Hi there,
Christmas day temps were
34 to 36C in Sydney, Dew points ~ -3C,Winds were W/NW
20/25kts Gusts around 40
knots.
Northern Rivers:T=35 to
41, Td=~10C Winds WSW to WNW up to around 25 knots
Similar stuff between there
and wollongong and ranges to west.
Synoptics: Low south of tassie,
strong westerly circulation around it. gradient
winds @30 to 40 knots. MesoLaps
did pretty well at the sigma 9875 level. (we
don't generally use any
lower than that)
Also: very strong thermal
gradient between Tassie and Sydney
Boxing Day:
Sydney : W/SW 15/20 knots
- light ESE on coast.
Blue Mountains: : W/SW 20/25
knots
if you want to check out the details AWS obs for NSW stations these are at:
http://serva.nsw.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/cmcgi/webdir.pl?d=/archive/station/2001/12/
PS:
Do you know what the
changes are that have been made to the model which will
allegedly make Mlaps better
over the ocean. ? How will they change it? ( ie in
what direction ? At the
moment most of us (incl me) use sigma 9875. This seems to
give reasonable esimation
of surface winds over both land and ocean. Some of us
prefer 9750 over land esp
ranges. Some of us think 9974 is Ok over ocean.
I have not noticed any noticeable
changes so far that encourage me to use lower
level winds. When talking
to Graham Warren a while ago he intimated that he had
been told coming changes
would incorporate better coupling between atmospher and
ocean. If this is what has
happened, increased winds should increase ocean
surface roughness, which
should decrease surface winds - and make them even lower
than before. Please tell
me this arm-waving argument is wrong, 'cause I don't
like the conclusion.
cheers
Elly Spark
Reply from Chris Webb
Hi John,
The 04Z Sydney Airport temp
trace showed a dry adiabat from the sfc to 640hpa
on xmas day.
Chris Webb
SAMU
From Russell Stringer
Hi all,
can
anyone point me to a display of NWP output showing the same information
for
Sunday?
(ie.
04Z Sydney Airport temp trace for 30 Dec?). Wait... I just discovered
http://cod.tas.bom.gov.au/forecast.html
(just need to know your lat/long)
For
that matter, can anyone point me to the latest observation of the same
information?
Wait... I just discovered
http://serva.sa.bom.gov.au/data/skewt/map.html
Cheers, Russell
From Milton Speer
I've
attached Kurnell radar reflectivities (smoke particles from pyrocumulus)
for
each of the last 4 days including today.
25
Dec 26 Dec
27 Dec 28
Dec 27
Dec_PPI
On
the 25th the fire from the largest smoke plume you can see crossing
southern
Sydney was ignited by lightning early morning on the 24th. 90 to 100
km/hr
gusts drove it through the Royal National Park to the coast by late on
the
25th. On the 26 and 27th milder W/SW winds although still fresh and gusty,
drove
the plumes. Today, the wind is back to the NW although light. We are all
gearing
up for Sunday with temps in the high 30s forecast and fresh W/NW winds
by
a squally souhterly change in the evening.
The
synoptic situation is very similar to early January 94 and looks like
being
a problem well into mid-week.
It's
a long wave trough over Vic/Tas longitudes, as in 1994, that's causing
the
hot westerlies over coastal NSW.
Local
convergence zones affect fire behaviour adversely by increasing flame
height
e.g. on the following velocity display from Kurnell Doppler radar the
orange
edge represents the seabreeze front across Sydney going away from the
radar
and blue represents westerlies going towards the radar (yesterday). The
orange
between Katoomba and YSRI is likely local anabatic flows up the east
slopes.
Milton