Jeff Feren (to laps_feedback)
During the Spring-early Summer
period (at least), there have been
several incursions of vertically
deep, anomalously cold air over the
Victorian region that have
not been well handled by LAPS. In particular,
the progged 500hPa temperatures
associated with the cold pool have often
been a few degrees higher
than observed. In contrast, the U.S. Aviation
Model (NCEP) has tended
to be highly accurate in its depiction of the
upper level cold pool ^Ö
if there has been any bias with this model, it
has sometimes slightly overdone
the cooling. There is, however, a
tendency for later model
runs of LAPS to play ^Ñcatch-up^Ò to NCEP. The
deficiency in LAPS has,
amongst other things, impacted on the quality of
forecasting of ^Ñcold
air mass^Ò thunderstorms over the State. Thus, some
forecasts (based largely
on LAPS) have indicated that thunderstorm
development would be no
more than a marginal prospect near the coast,
whereas thunderstorms did,
in fact, develop and extended as far north as
the northern Victoria/southern
N.S.W. region. The most recent example of
such an occurrence was on
2/1/02. On my nightshift, during the period of
amplification of the upper
cold pool prior to the thunderstorm
development, I noted that
an 18Z AMDAR trace indicated a 500hPa
temperature at Melbourne
already 3 degrees lower than that on the +6
hour LAPS prog.
Is it possible to rectify this problem?
A possibly related matter
is the question of exactly what temp/wind
flight data is actually
incorporated into the new model run of LAPS,
particularly during the
daylight savings period. Thus, it seems that the
00Z and 12Z models are more
or less run at the same local time (in
Melbourne), regardless of
the time of year, yet the balloons are
released 1 hour later (for
States observing DST) during the summer
period. For the 12Z model
run, in particular, there have been several
times when we have been
receiving the new model output whilst upper
sonde data is till being
received. I understand that a web site was to
be set up which would enable
forecasters to know exactly what (upper
wind/temp) data was included
in the latest initialisation of LAPS
(GASP). Is there such a
site?
Geoff Feren
Vic Regional Office
Jim Fraser
Geoff,
Regarding the operational
aspects of your query, the LAPS model run is
kicked off in NMOC at ~01:00Z
and ~12:55Z (+/-10min) each day. This time
has been chosen to enable
timely product generation while still ensuring
that most of the local Australian
observations are in and available for
use in the data assimilation.
There may occasionally be a few stragglers
but generally all the sonde
data is in by this time.
As far as finding out exactly
what data was included in the latest
initialisation of LAPS (GASP),
something like this is available on the
NMOC webpage for LAPS at
http://nmocrtop.ho.bom.gov.au/pks/system_component_times_laps_pt375.html
and for GASP at
http://vortex.ho.bom.gov.au/gasp/obs_multi.html
The LAPS charts show the
observational data distribution derived directly
from the box files that
are used by the analysis component of the
assimilation. The GASP charts
show the global data available in the
operational realtime database
for the 6hr time window around the 11z/23z
assimilation basetime.
There are some caveats with
these plots though:
* although they show distribution
of available data they don't indicate
whether the data
was actually used in the assimilation - some data may
be rejected for whatever
reason.
* they do not indicate the
actual weight paid to the data inside the
the assimilation
scheme, data weights vary depending on time of
measurement, data
type, density of surrounding data points etc.
regards
Jim Fraser, NMOC